<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenURL-enabling Google Scholar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wallandbinkley.com/quaedam/?feed=rss2&#038;p=24" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wallandbinkley.com/quaedam/?p=24</link>
	<description>Morning postings from Route 66</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.wallandbinkley.com/quaedam/?p=24&#038;cpage=1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 03:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wallandbinkley.com/quaedam/?p=24#comment-66</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Google wants to treat Google Scholar users as their users, but there’s reason to suspect that they may be better served if we treat them as our users. Since we’re the ones providing access to the licensed resources&lt;/i&gt;...

Peter:  this is the most articulate argument I&#039;ve seen for why we should have some leverage with Google.  Extremely well put.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Google wants to treat Google Scholar users as their users, but there’s reason to suspect that they may be better served if we treat them as our users. Since we’re the ones providing access to the licensed resources</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter:  this is the most articulate argument I&#8217;ve seen for why we should have some leverage with Google.  Extremely well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
